Second Life Intellectual Group Discussion Topic
Engineering the perfect human
from Braincrave Second Life staff
Mar 04, 2011
Click here to start Braincrave.com Second Life Intellectual Discussion Group via IRC - no membership requiredDiscuss this article live, right now, in chat - no membership required

Share submit to hubski
Recently Active Users  
Looking to date people who like to think? For a limited time, completed profiles get a free 6-month Gold membership! Use promotion code THINK

Recently, Harvard University had a panel discussing the legacy of the Human Genome Project. Started in 1990, and with scientists from six countries and initial funding of $3 billion, the project published the full sequence of about 21,000 genes that are the basic instructions of building a human. Needless to say, the implications of better understanding human biology at a genetic level are enormous. For example, with such information, we can better fight or prevent disease. And the costs to decode genomes is dropping dramatically - "[t]echnology today can do in five minutes a decoding task that would have taken a year to complete a decade ago." Needless to say, these are very exciting times in this field.

But perhaps caution should temper our excitement as the enormous implications of understanding our biology come with ethical questions that have not been answered and might never be answered. For example, it's only a matter of time when we will be able to manipulate or engineer genes to alter exactly the traits we want. Should we? Similar to the movie Gattaca, which proclaims that there is no gene for the human spirit, should we use science to create "perfect" human beings? How could genetic engineering negatively intervene in our evolution and affect future generations? Also, in a world where genetic engineering is possible but expensive and, therefore, only those with the proper financial resources can benefit, will we see the ultimate class war - the "perfect" vs. the "imperfect?" The science is getting to the point where these are no longer theoretical questions. If you could, would you want to be genetically engineered? What about your children?

FTA: "Enhancement engineering is widely regarded as both scientifically and ethically problematic. From a scientific standpoint, it is unlikely that we will soon be able to enhance normally functioning genes without risking grave side effects. For example:
  • Enhancing an individual's height beyond his or her naturally ordained level may inadvertently cause stress to other parts of the organism, such as the heart.
  • Moreover, many of the traits that might be targeted for enhancement (e.g., intelligence or memory) are genetically multifactorial, and have a strong environmental component. Thus, alteration of single genes would not likely achieve the desired outcome.
  • These problems are magnified, and additional problems arise, when we move from somatic cell enhancements to germline enhancements.
In addition to the problem of disseminating unforeseen consequences across generations, we are faced with questions about whether future generations would share their predecessors' views about the desirability of the traits that have been bequeathed to them. Future generations are not likely to be ungrateful if we deprive them of genes associated with horrible diseases, but they may well feel limited by choices we have made regarding their physical, cognitive, or emotional traits. In short, there is a danger that social-historical trends and biases could place genetic limitations on future generations...

Once we pinpoint the genetic basis for diseases and other phenotypic traits, what parameters should be set for the acquisition and use of genetic information? The key issue to be considered here is the use of genetic screening. Screening for diseases with the due consent of a patient or a legal proxy is generally viewed as ethically permissible, but even this form of screening can create some significant ethical challenges. Knowledge that one is or may be affected by a serious disease can create difficult situations for both patients and their families. Consider:
  • If a test is positive, what options, medical or otherwise, will be available to ameliorate the condition?
  • Will the patient's relatives be informed that they too may be affected by the ailment?"
The Human Genome Project: A Scientific and Ethical Overview


DISCUSS!


The Braincrave.com discussion group on Second Life is 500 lindens to join and has open enrollment. We are a community of men and women who seek beauty and stimulation through our minds. We find ideas, education, and self-improvement sexy. We think intelligence is hot. But Braincrave.com is more than brains and I.Q. alone. We are curious. We have common sense. We value and offer wisdom. We experiment. We have great imaginations. We devour literacy. We are intellectually honest. We support and encourage each other to be better. Braincrave.com intellectual group discussions in Second Life are typically held at 12:00 PM SLT (PST) and 7:00 PM SLT. The discussions take place in Second Life group chat so you must be a member of the Second Life group to participate or you can participate as a non-member through our IRC link.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work, excluding any content linked via another source/website, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given and references the URL: http://www.braincrave.com/viewblog.php?id=491.

Click here to start Braincrave.com Second Life Intellectual Discussion Group via IRC - no membership requiredDiscuss this article live, right now, in chat

LIKED THIS ARTICLE?
E-mail and tell them so! And also make sure to Bookmark and Share it!

Views: 3358    Sanctions: 5  (based on 1 awards)     Next Article
Advertisement: